<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Business Legal News from Blackadders Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com</link>
	<description>The latest news covering commercial property, construction, planning, employment law, corporate &#38; commercial, licensing &#38; intellectual property</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holidays on the shore or offshore by Blackadders Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/12/16/holidays-on-the-shore-or-offshore/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackadders Solicitors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=571#comment-762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employees should always take the holidays that they are entitled to.  There is a statutory right for all employees to a minimum amount of paid annual leave each year.  The employer should not deprive employees of their minimum holiday entitlements.  You might be correct in saying that many employees are too scared to raise the issue for fear of their job.  However this should not be the case.  If an employer refuses to allow an employee to take holidays, a starting point for the employee might be to raise a formal grievance with the employer.  Hopefully that will make the employer think twice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employees should always take the holidays that they are entitled to.  There is a statutory right for all employees to a minimum amount of paid annual leave each year.  The employer should not deprive employees of their minimum holiday entitlements.  You might be correct in saying that many employees are too scared to raise the issue for fear of their job.  However this should not be the case.  If an employer refuses to allow an employee to take holidays, a starting point for the employee might be to raise a formal grievance with the employer.  Hopefully that will make the employer think twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holidays on the shore or offshore by drummondssolicitors</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/12/16/holidays-on-the-shore-or-offshore/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drummondssolicitors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=571#comment-761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been denied holidays before when i was entitled to them? i feel that to many people are to scared to come forward because jobs are hard to come by these days so do not want to risk there job?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been denied holidays before when i was entitled to them? i feel that to many people are to scared to come forward because jobs are hard to come by these days so do not want to risk there job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 by Blackadders Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/05/04/the-tenancy-deposit-schemes-scotland-regulations-2011/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackadders Solicitors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=451#comment-759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The protection of deposits will vary depending on when the deposit was received and when the first scheme becomes operational. 

From what you have told me I am assuming that you handed over your deposit in January 2007. I note that you ceased to be tenant in June 2009.

The duty to comply with the regulations will not apply until an approved scheme is in operation. As far as I am aware, the first scheme is still to become operational in Scotland. 

A tenancy deposit scheme will not come into effect until proposals are submitted to Scottish Ministers, when suitable schemes are approved and when a scheme is ready to start receiving deposits. Details of any schemes approved and the dates on which they will become available will be announced in due course.

The Scottish Government will work with local authorities and other agencies and organisations to ensure that those affected by the proposed regulations are well informed. Those responsible for operating approved schemes must also publicise the schemes across Scotland at the point that they are approved, prior to the scheme becoming operational and for some time thereafter.

All deposits received after a scheme first becomes operational must be submitted to an approved scheme, and information provided to tenants within 30 working days of the start of the tenancy.

Where the deposit was received before a scheme first becomes operational, one of two timescales will apply:

1. The deposit is received before 7 March 2011 - the landlord must comply within 30 working days of

a) the date of renewal of any tenancy which occurs between 3 and 9 months after a scheme first becomes operational, or

b) in any other case, the date that falls 9 months after the first operational date.

2. The deposit is received between 7 March 2011 and the date the first scheme becomes operational - the landlord must comply within 30 working days of the date that falls 3 months after the date the first scheme becomes operational.


I have not come across any guidelines or material in relation to any arguments related to the return of a deposit where the lease has come to an end. I would assume that the Landlord will not be obliged to submit your deposit to a scheme as they will probably have a new tenant in the property now who will be effected by these regulations (or the property may have been sold when you moved out). 

We will not know what effect these regulations will have on Landlords and Tenants until an approved scheme is in operation. There have been no indications of when this will occur. 


Nicola McCafferty, Solicitor, Blackadders LLP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The protection of deposits will vary depending on when the deposit was received and when the first scheme becomes operational. </p>
<p>From what you have told me I am assuming that you handed over your deposit in January 2007. I note that you ceased to be tenant in June 2009.</p>
<p>The duty to comply with the regulations will not apply until an approved scheme is in operation. As far as I am aware, the first scheme is still to become operational in Scotland. </p>
<p>A tenancy deposit scheme will not come into effect until proposals are submitted to Scottish Ministers, when suitable schemes are approved and when a scheme is ready to start receiving deposits. Details of any schemes approved and the dates on which they will become available will be announced in due course.</p>
<p>The Scottish Government will work with local authorities and other agencies and organisations to ensure that those affected by the proposed regulations are well informed. Those responsible for operating approved schemes must also publicise the schemes across Scotland at the point that they are approved, prior to the scheme becoming operational and for some time thereafter.</p>
<p>All deposits received after a scheme first becomes operational must be submitted to an approved scheme, and information provided to tenants within 30 working days of the start of the tenancy.</p>
<p>Where the deposit was received before a scheme first becomes operational, one of two timescales will apply:</p>
<p>1. The deposit is received before 7 March 2011 &#8211; the landlord must comply within 30 working days of</p>
<p>a) the date of renewal of any tenancy which occurs between 3 and 9 months after a scheme first becomes operational, or</p>
<p>b) in any other case, the date that falls 9 months after the first operational date.</p>
<p>2. The deposit is received between 7 March 2011 and the date the first scheme becomes operational &#8211; the landlord must comply within 30 working days of the date that falls 3 months after the date the first scheme becomes operational.</p>
<p>I have not come across any guidelines or material in relation to any arguments related to the return of a deposit where the lease has come to an end. I would assume that the Landlord will not be obliged to submit your deposit to a scheme as they will probably have a new tenant in the property now who will be effected by these regulations (or the property may have been sold when you moved out). </p>
<p>We will not know what effect these regulations will have on Landlords and Tenants until an approved scheme is in operation. There have been no indications of when this will occur. </p>
<p>Nicola McCafferty, Solicitor, Blackadders LLP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 by Scott Remington</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/05/04/the-tenancy-deposit-schemes-scotland-regulations-2011/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Remington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=451#comment-758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I currently have a dispute with my previous landlord regarding deposit return.  I was a tenant until the end of June 2011 - about 2.5 years duration.
They did not use this deposit scheme.
Had it come into affect,  do I have any legal fire power to challenge them with?
Best regards,
Scott]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have a dispute with my previous landlord regarding deposit return.  I was a tenant until the end of June 2011 &#8211; about 2.5 years duration.<br />
They did not use this deposit scheme.<br />
Had it come into affect,  do I have any legal fire power to challenge them with?<br />
Best regards,<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 by Blackadders Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/05/04/the-tenancy-deposit-schemes-scotland-regulations-2011/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackadders Solicitors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=451#comment-743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 5 of the Regulations state the procedures for payment, holding and repayment of deposits.  

Basically, it is a landlord who must apply to the scheme administrator for repayment of any tenancy deposit paid to an approved scheme on, or as soon as is reasonably practicable after, the end of the tenancy. The landlord’s application must specify the date on which the tenancy ended and the amount of the tenancy deposit which, in the view of the landlord, should be repaid to the tenant and also repaid to the landlord. 

A tenant may also apply for repayment of the tenancy deposit. However, if an application for repayment has already been made by the landlord, or is made within 30 working days of the tenant’s application, the scheme administrator will not progress the tenants application and will only deal with the landlord’s application.

Sections 29 to 32 deal with the repayment of a deposit by the scheme administrator where there is a disputed amount. 

Where the scheme administrator receives notification from the tenant of a disputed amount then the scheme administrator must hold that amount in a designated account until the dispute is resolved. If any proportion of the tenancy deposit is undisputed, the scheme administrator must repay that amount as soon as is practicable.

If the administrator does not receive from the tenant a request for, or consent to, use of a dispute resolution mechanism made available by the scheme administrator and the tenant does not otherwise agree with the landlord the amounts to be repaid then:- (1) on the fifteen working day after receipt of the notification the scheme administrator must write to the tenant to remind the tenant of the procedure for requesting a referral to the dispute resolution mechanism; and (2) on the thirtieth working day after receipt of the notification the scheme administrator must advise the tenant that the tenancy deposit is to be repaid in accordance with the amounts specified in the landlord’s application and then repay the tenancy deposit in accordance with that application within the next five working days. 

However, if the scheme administrator receives notification that the dispute has been resolved by agreement between the landlord and the tenant, the scheme administrator must repay the tenancy deposit in accordance with that agreement within five working days. 

Part 6 of the Regulations outlines the dispute resolution mechanism. 

A scheme administrator must make available a mechanism for the resolution by an adjudicator of disputes between landlords and tenants about the amount of the tenancy deposit to be repaid to the tenant at the end of a tenancy. The dispute resolution mechanism must be provided free of charge to both the landlord and the tenant. Use of the dispute resolution mechanism must not be compulsory, but the tenancy deposit scheme must require a landlord who has submitted a deposit to it to use the dispute resolution mechanism in any case where the tenant requests a referral. The adjudicator must decide any dispute within twenty working days of receipt of the referral and must then give notice of their decision in writing to the scheme administrator, the landlord and the tenant within five working days of reaching their decision. 

Sections 37 and 38 provide for the occasion where a landlord or tenant require to apply to the scheme administrator for review of any decision reached by the adjudicator, but only on the grounds that the adjudicator has erred in fact or in law (or both).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 5 of the Regulations state the procedures for payment, holding and repayment of deposits.  </p>
<p>Basically, it is a landlord who must apply to the scheme administrator for repayment of any tenancy deposit paid to an approved scheme on, or as soon as is reasonably practicable after, the end of the tenancy. The landlord’s application must specify the date on which the tenancy ended and the amount of the tenancy deposit which, in the view of the landlord, should be repaid to the tenant and also repaid to the landlord. </p>
<p>A tenant may also apply for repayment of the tenancy deposit. However, if an application for repayment has already been made by the landlord, or is made within 30 working days of the tenant’s application, the scheme administrator will not progress the tenants application and will only deal with the landlord’s application.</p>
<p>Sections 29 to 32 deal with the repayment of a deposit by the scheme administrator where there is a disputed amount. </p>
<p>Where the scheme administrator receives notification from the tenant of a disputed amount then the scheme administrator must hold that amount in a designated account until the dispute is resolved. If any proportion of the tenancy deposit is undisputed, the scheme administrator must repay that amount as soon as is practicable.</p>
<p>If the administrator does not receive from the tenant a request for, or consent to, use of a dispute resolution mechanism made available by the scheme administrator and the tenant does not otherwise agree with the landlord the amounts to be repaid then:- (1) on the fifteen working day after receipt of the notification the scheme administrator must write to the tenant to remind the tenant of the procedure for requesting a referral to the dispute resolution mechanism; and (2) on the thirtieth working day after receipt of the notification the scheme administrator must advise the tenant that the tenancy deposit is to be repaid in accordance with the amounts specified in the landlord’s application and then repay the tenancy deposit in accordance with that application within the next five working days. </p>
<p>However, if the scheme administrator receives notification that the dispute has been resolved by agreement between the landlord and the tenant, the scheme administrator must repay the tenancy deposit in accordance with that agreement within five working days. </p>
<p>Part 6 of the Regulations outlines the dispute resolution mechanism. </p>
<p>A scheme administrator must make available a mechanism for the resolution by an adjudicator of disputes between landlords and tenants about the amount of the tenancy deposit to be repaid to the tenant at the end of a tenancy. The dispute resolution mechanism must be provided free of charge to both the landlord and the tenant. Use of the dispute resolution mechanism must not be compulsory, but the tenancy deposit scheme must require a landlord who has submitted a deposit to it to use the dispute resolution mechanism in any case where the tenant requests a referral. The adjudicator must decide any dispute within twenty working days of receipt of the referral and must then give notice of their decision in writing to the scheme administrator, the landlord and the tenant within five working days of reaching their decision. </p>
<p>Sections 37 and 38 provide for the occasion where a landlord or tenant require to apply to the scheme administrator for review of any decision reached by the adjudicator, but only on the grounds that the adjudicator has erred in fact or in law (or both).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 by Blackadders Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/05/04/the-tenancy-deposit-schemes-scotland-regulations-2011/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackadders Solicitors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=451#comment-742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not aware of any proposals for a scheme that will register tenants that have been in default.

Link to The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011:-
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2011/176/contents/made]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not aware of any proposals for a scheme that will register tenants that have been in default.</p>
<p>Link to The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011:-<br />
<a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2011/176/contents/made" rel="nofollow">http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2011/176/contents/made</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 by Nick Smith</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/05/04/the-tenancy-deposit-schemes-scotland-regulations-2011/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=451#comment-741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there to be a scheme that will register tenants that have been in default and have had to be evicted? There seems to be much happening to control landlords - but nothing to protect them from bad tenants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there to be a scheme that will register tenants that have been in default and have had to be evicted? There seems to be much happening to control landlords &#8211; but nothing to protect them from bad tenants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011 by Nick Smith</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2011/05/04/the-tenancy-deposit-schemes-scotland-regulations-2011/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=451#comment-740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who decides the proportion of deposit to be returned when a property is left in a bad state?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who decides the proportion of deposit to be returned when a property is left in a bad state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Employment Law Q &amp; A by google</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2010/11/02/employment-law-q-a/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[google]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=234#comment-493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a extraordinary job!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a extraordinary job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Property Factors (Scotland) Bill to ensure standards of practice by Michael Houston</title>
		<link>http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/2010/09/29/property-factors-scotland-bill-to-ensure-standards-of-practice/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Houston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackaddersbusinesslegalnews.com/?p=206#comment-479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I welcome any legislation that will help to tidy up this &quot;licence to print money&quot; type of industry, my problem is with the notion of factors in the first place. Why, just because I live in a certain type of accommodation (a tenement flat) am I forced to pay some third party to look after the fabric of the building and common areas? We have been told that we are perfectly free to sack our factors by majority vote but only on the condition that we either move to another factor or we manage it ourselves. The main problem here, is to find agreement with 8 residential tenants and 3 commercial tenants. We are currently &quot;factored&quot; by one of the biggest firms in Scotland and they are, quite frankly, hopeless. They carry out work without giving us prior notice, they cherry pick jobs according to complexity/profit gain and they choose contractors from the other side of the city, instead of using local tradesmen. I&#039;d never lived in a flat in Scotland before moving here and the principle of having a factor did appeal initially. It makes sense for someone to look after the basic maintenance and repair of our building. But, after 12 years of hassle and grief, I want rid of them, yet due to some archaic law, which I&#039;m sure has its&#039; origins in the old Clan system, I&#039;m tied to these muppets. I&#039;m now at the stage of seeking legal advice as they have carried out some &quot;repairs&quot; recently which are, quite simply, bodges. Furthermore, some 5 or 6 years ago, when there was a problem with the main sewage drain at the back of the property, they left us to wade through our own effluent for one and a half years, before the council served an order on the property and fixed it. The factors reason as to why they would not fix it? They insisted that we pay them upfront before they commence any work, the implication being that we would not pay for such an important repair. This is the thing that annoys me most, the principle behind the Scottish factoring system is patronising. The idea that we would let our property fall into disrepair, simply because we do not have a third party dealing with it, is risible. I pay my mortgage to a building society, my name is on the property deeds, I pay insurance on the property and yet, an anonymous third-party has the right to say when, what and how the fabric of my own property is maintained/repaired as necessary. I believe this is discriminatory (people living in houses do not need to be factored) and I also believe it to be an infringement on both my civil liberties and human rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I welcome any legislation that will help to tidy up this &#8220;licence to print money&#8221; type of industry, my problem is with the notion of factors in the first place. Why, just because I live in a certain type of accommodation (a tenement flat) am I forced to pay some third party to look after the fabric of the building and common areas? We have been told that we are perfectly free to sack our factors by majority vote but only on the condition that we either move to another factor or we manage it ourselves. The main problem here, is to find agreement with 8 residential tenants and 3 commercial tenants. We are currently &#8220;factored&#8221; by one of the biggest firms in Scotland and they are, quite frankly, hopeless. They carry out work without giving us prior notice, they cherry pick jobs according to complexity/profit gain and they choose contractors from the other side of the city, instead of using local tradesmen. I&#8217;d never lived in a flat in Scotland before moving here and the principle of having a factor did appeal initially. It makes sense for someone to look after the basic maintenance and repair of our building. But, after 12 years of hassle and grief, I want rid of them, yet due to some archaic law, which I&#8217;m sure has its&#8217; origins in the old Clan system, I&#8217;m tied to these muppets. I&#8217;m now at the stage of seeking legal advice as they have carried out some &#8220;repairs&#8221; recently which are, quite simply, bodges. Furthermore, some 5 or 6 years ago, when there was a problem with the main sewage drain at the back of the property, they left us to wade through our own effluent for one and a half years, before the council served an order on the property and fixed it. The factors reason as to why they would not fix it? They insisted that we pay them upfront before they commence any work, the implication being that we would not pay for such an important repair. This is the thing that annoys me most, the principle behind the Scottish factoring system is patronising. The idea that we would let our property fall into disrepair, simply because we do not have a third party dealing with it, is risible. I pay my mortgage to a building society, my name is on the property deeds, I pay insurance on the property and yet, an anonymous third-party has the right to say when, what and how the fabric of my own property is maintained/repaired as necessary. I believe this is discriminatory (people living in houses do not need to be factored) and I also believe it to be an infringement on both my civil liberties and human rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

